DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2011 Nissan Note Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan Note
MazdaMakeNissan
3ModelNote
2004Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan Note
11,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
182 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1386 cc
105 HPPower88 HP
145 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan Note
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan Note
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R15; 185/65 R15; 185/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan Note
4420 mmLength4100 mm
1755 mmWidth1690 mm
1465 mmHeight1550 mm
1185 KgWeight1092 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2011 Nissan Note approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…