DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 3 vs 2007 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
3ModelV50
2007Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
215 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V50
4415 mmLength4522 mm
1755 mmWidth1845 mm
1465 mmHeight1457 mm
1270 KgWeight1416 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 3 and 2007 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…