E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 3 vs 2011 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
3ModelAD
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
116 HPPower109 HP
270 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
4580 mmLength4395 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1470 mmHeight1500 mm
1240 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 3 and 2011 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2011 Peugeot 508VS2011 Mazda 3Peugeot 508 vs Mazda 32011 and 2011 model yearsImage unavailableVS2011 Mazda 3Honda CR-Z vs Mazda 32011 and 2011 model years2011 Peugeot 206VS2011 Mazda 3Peugeot 206 vs Mazda 32011 and 2011 model yearsImage unavailableVS2011 Mazda 3Nissan AD vs Mazda 32011 and 2011 model years2011 Toyota PorteVS2011 Mazda 3Toyota Porte vs Mazda 32011 and 2011 model years

Comments are loading…