DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Fiat Egea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Egea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

60.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationFiat Egea
MazdaMakeFiat
3ModelEgea
2012Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationFiat Egea
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
186 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
115 HPPower95 HP
270 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationFiat Egea
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationFiat Egea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationFiat Egea
4460 mmLength4532 mm
1755 mmWidth1792 mm
1470 mmHeight1497 mm
1255 KgWeight1205 kg
—Luggage capacity520 lt
2640 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda 3

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat EgeaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2017 Fiat Egea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Egea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…