DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 3 vs 2007 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
3ModelAD
2007Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
4415 mmLength4395 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1465 mmHeight1500 mm
1275 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 3 and 2007 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…