2008 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.4i (84 Hp) 2008Overall Score50.25/100
2008 Mazda 3 vs 2008 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.3 CDTI (75 Hp) 2008Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
3ModelCombo
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
14,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
169 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
84 HPPower75 HP
122 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Combo
4415 mmLength4322 mm
1755 mmWidth1684 mm
1465 mmHeight1801 mm
1190 KgWeight1278 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2716 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Mazda 3 and 2008 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…