DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C3
MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelC3
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C3
14,3 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
169 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
84 HPPower68 HP
122 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C3
4420 mmLength3850 mm
1755 mmWidth1667 mm
1465 mmHeight1529 mm
1180 KgWeight1022 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…