DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 2 vs 2007 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelV50
2007Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
11,4 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
181 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
101 HPPower100 HP
146 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
3925 mmLength4522 mm
1680 mmWidth1845 mm
1545 mmHeight1457 mm
1080 KgWeight1335 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 2 and 2007 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…