DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 2 vs 2011 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
MazdaMakeRenault
2ModelClio
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
175 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower110 HP
205 NmTorque151 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
3920 mmLength4027 mm
1695 mmWidth2025 mm
1475 mmHeight1497 mm
1025 KgWeight1190 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 2 and 2011 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…