DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 2 vs 2011 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
2ModelAD
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
95 HPPower124 HP
205 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
3920 mmLength4395 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1475 mmHeight1500 mm
1025 KgWeight1140 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 2 and 2011 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…