DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 2 vs 2011 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelC3
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
175 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
205 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption9 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
3920 mmLength4078 mm
1695 mmWidth1766 mm
1475 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1025 KgWeight1290 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 2 and 2011 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…