DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda 2 vs 2009 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelS80
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S80
11,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
205 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo S80
3900 mmLength4851 mm
1695 mmWidth1861 mm
1475 mmHeight1493 mm
1030 KgWeight1630 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda 2 and 2009 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…