DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda 2 vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelV50
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
103 HPPower100 HP
137 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo V50
3900 mmLength4522 mm
1695 mmWidth1845 mm
1475 mmHeight1457 mm
960 KgWeight1335 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda 2 and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…