DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 2 vs 2014 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
MazdaMakeRenault
2ModelClio
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
8,7 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
200 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/60 R16Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Clio
4060 mmLength4062 mm
1695 mmWidth1732 mm
1495 mmHeight1448 mm
975 KgWeight980 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 2 and 2014 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…