DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 2 vs 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover H6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
2ModelHover H6
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h11,2-11.4 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
115 HPPower143 HP
148 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/60 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4060 mmLength4640 mm
1695 mmWidth1825 mm
1495 mmHeight1745 mm
975 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 2 and 2014 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover H6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…