2003 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.4i 16V (80 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Mazda 2 vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelXsara
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
13,9 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
164 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
80 HPPower68 HP
124 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
3925 mmLength4167 mm
1680 mmWidth1698 mm
1545 mmHeight1405 mm
1050 KgWeight1120 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 2 and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…