DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 2 vs 2005 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelC3
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
15,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
160 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
68 HPPower68 HP
160 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
3925 mmLength3850 mm
1680 mmWidth1667 mm
1545 mmHeight1529 mm
1085 KgWeight1022 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 2 and 2005 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…