DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 2 vs 2011 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
2ModelCombo
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
13,6 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
172 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
84 HPPower75 HP
121 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
3920 mmLength4322 mm
1695 mmWidth1684 mm
1475 mmHeight1801 mm
960 KgWeight1278 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 2 and 2011 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…