DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 2 vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelC3
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
14,0 s0–100 km/h16,2 s
168 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
119 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 EGS
—Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
3900 mmLength3941 mm
1695 mmWidth1728 mm
1475 mmHeight1524 mm
960 KgWeight1145 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 2 and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…