DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 1995 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
121ModelVitara
1996Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

17,4 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed144 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1589 cc
60 HPPower80 HP
105 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size195 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3620 mm
1634 mmWidth1630 mm
1330 mmHeight1665 mm
1015 KgWeight1020 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 1995 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…