1996 • Mazda
121
Mazda 121 1.8 D (60 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.25/100
1996 Mazda 121 vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 1.3 i (63 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 121SpecificationRover Mini MK
MazdaMakeRover
121ModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 121SpecificationRover Mini MK
17,4 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
155 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
105 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 121SpecificationRover Mini MK
DieselFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 121SpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12 Q
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 121SpecificationRover Mini MK
3828 mmLength3100 mm
1634 mmWidth1440 mm
1330 mmHeight1351 mm
1015 KgWeight700 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda 121 and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…