DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 1996 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
MazdaMakeRenault
121Model19
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
17,4 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
60 HPPower90 HP
105 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
DieselFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 121SpecificationRenault 19
3828 mmLength4248 mm
1634 mmWidth1696 mm
1330 mmHeight1412 mm
1015 KgWeight1045 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 1996 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…