DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 121 vs 1995 Zastava 128 Skala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava 128 Skala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeZastava
121Model128 Skala
1996Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

15,9 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1302 cc
60 HPPower65 HP
103 NmTorque98 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank36 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size145/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3840 mm
1634 mmWidth1590 mm
1330 mmHeight1350 mm
930 KgWeight840 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 121 and 1995 Zastava 128 Skala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava 128 Skala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…