DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Tata Indica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Indica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeTata
121ModelIndica
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
143 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
50 HPPower54 HP
97 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3660 mm
1634 mmWidth1625 mm
1330 mmHeight1485 mm
930 KgWeight850 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda 121 and 2000 Tata Indica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…