1999 • Mazda
121
Mazda 121 1.2 (75 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 i 16V (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 121SpecificationRenault Clio
MazdaMakeRenault
121ModelClio
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 121SpecificationRenault Clio
12,7 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
110 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 121SpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 121SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 121SpecificationRenault Clio
3828 mmLength3773 mm
1634 mmWidth1639 mm
1330 mmHeight1417 mm
915 KgWeight985 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2471 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda 121 and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…