1996 • Mazda
121
Mazda 121 1.2 (75 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
1996 Mazda 121 vs 2000 Nissan March Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.3i 16V (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Nissan March
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 121SpecificationNissan March
MazdaMakeNissan
121ModelMarch
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 121SpecificationNissan March
12,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
110 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 121SpecificationNissan March
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 121SpecificationNissan March
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size165/60R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 121SpecificationNissan March
3828 mmLength3695 mm
1634 mmWidth1585 mm
1330 mmHeight1430 mm
915 KgWeight825 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda 121 and 2000 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan March leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…