2012 • Maybach
62 S
Maybach 62 S 6.0 V12 (621 Hp) 2012Overall Score90.5/100
2012 Maybach 62 S vs 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2018 • Rolls-Royce
Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 (571 Hp) 2018Overall Score92.5/100
WINNER
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.
90.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Maybach 62 SSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
MaybachMakeRolls-Royce
62 SModelCullinan
2012Model year2018
SedanBody typeSUV
4Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Maybach 62 SSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
5,1 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5980 ccEngine displacement6749 cc
621 HPPower571 HP
1000 NmTorque850 Nm
12Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Maybach 62 SSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
PetrolFuel typePetrol
110 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption21,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,9 lt
15,8 ltAverage consumption15,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Maybach 62 SSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears8
275/45 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Maybach 62 SSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
6171 mmLength5341 mm
1980 mmWidth2000 mm
1573 mmHeight1835 mm
2855 KgWeight2660 Kg
3827 mmWheelbase3295 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Maybach 62 S and 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rolls-Royce Cullinan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…