DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Maybach 62 vs 2008 Ford Shelby Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Shelby

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MaybachMakeFord
62ModelShelby
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5513 ccEngine displacement5409 cc
543 HPPower507 HP
900 NmTorque650 Nm
12Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
110 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
15,0 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
275/50 R19Tyre size255/45 R18; 285/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

6171 mmLength4765 mm
1980 mmWidth1877 mm
1573 mmHeight1384 mm
2855 KgWeight1780 Kg
3827 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Maybach 62 and 2008 Ford Shelby approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Shelby leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…