DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A4 vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

71.75–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
A4ModelASX
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
122 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
3,7 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4726 mmLength4295 mm
1842 mmWidth1770 mm
1427 mmHeight1625 mm
1430 KgWeight1360 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A4 and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…