DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Maruti Gypsy vs 2016 Mitsubishi Attrage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Maruti Gypsy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MarutiMakeMitsubishi
GypsyModelAttrage
2016Model year2016
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
130 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
80 HPPower80 HP
103 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
205/70 R15Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4100 mmLength4245 mm
1540 mmWidth1670 mm
1845 mmHeight1515 mm
1020 KgWeight930 kg
—Luggage capacity450 lt
2375 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mitsubishi AttrageDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Maruti Gypsy and 2016 Mitsubishi Attrage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Maruti Gypsy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…