DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Marcos TS vs 2004 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Marcos TS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MarcosMakeLand Rover
TSModelFreelander
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
220 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
15 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/40 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4005 mmLength4433 mm
1680 mmWidth1809 mm
1150 mmHeight1709 mm
1075 KgWeight1550 Kg
2225 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Marcos TS and 2004 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Marcos TS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…