2012 • Mahindra
Xylo
Mahindra Xylo 2.5 CRDe (95 Hp) 2012Overall Score48.5/100
2012 Mahindra Xylo vs 2012 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0 (85 Hp) 2012Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mahindra XyloSpecificationNissan Cedric
MahindraMakeNissan
XyloModelCedric
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mahindra XyloSpecificationNissan Cedric
16,4 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
144 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2486 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
95 HPPower85 HP
218 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mahindra XyloSpecificationNissan Cedric
DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mahindra XyloSpecificationNissan Cedric
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
Dimensions
Mahindra XyloSpecificationNissan Cedric
4520 mmLength4690 mm
1850 mmWidth1695 mm
1880 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1480 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mahindra Xylo and 2012 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…