DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mahindra Xylo vs 2016 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Steed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MahindraMakeGreat Wall
XyloModelSteed
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
160 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
120 HPPower150 HP
280 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
215/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength5040 mm
1850 mmWidth1800 mm
1905 mmHeight1730 mm
2760 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mahindra Xylo and 2016 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Steed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…