DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mahindra Xylo vs 2012 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MahindraMakeNissan
XyloModelAD
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
160 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
120 HPPower124 HP
280 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4395 mm
1850 mmWidth1695 mm
1905 mmHeight1500 mm
—Weight1140 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mahindra Xylo and 2012 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…