DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mahindra Armada vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mahindra Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.5–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MahindraMakeLand Rover
ArmadaModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h18,5 s
113 km/hTop speed148 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
72 HPPower113 HP
152 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank88 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4360 mmLength4520 mm
1800 mmWidth1795 mm
1738 mmHeight1960 mm
1730 KgWeight1925 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mahindra Armada and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mahindra Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…