DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Lotus Evora vs 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LotusMakeLand Rover
EvoraModelRange Rover
2014Model year2017
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
261 km/hTop speed209 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
280 HPPower340 HP
342 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank103 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
225/40 R18; 255/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength5000 mm
1848 mmWidth—
1229 mmHeight1869 mm
1382 KgWeight2256 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2922 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Lotus Evora and 2017 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…