2014 • Lotus
Evora
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 (280 Hp) 2014Overall Score88.5/100
2014 Lotus Evora vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 3.0 SD V6 (340 Hp) 2016Overall Score88.75/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lotus EvoraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
LotusMakeLand Rover
EvoraModelRange Rover
2014Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Lotus EvoraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
261 km/hTop speed218 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
280 HPPower292 HP
342 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Lotus EvoraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Diesel / Electric
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lotus EvoraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
225/40 R18; 255/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Lotus EvoraSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4350 mmLength4999 mm
1848 mmWidth1983 mm
1229 mmHeight1835 mm
1382 KgWeight2394 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2922 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Lotus Evora and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…