2014 • Lotus
Evora
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 (280 Hp) 2014Overall Score88.5/100
2014 Lotus Evora vs 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Jeep
Grand Cherokee
Jeep Grand Cherokee Summit 2016 3.0 V6 250 HPOverall Score88.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lotus EvoraSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
LotusMakeJeep
EvoraModelGrand Cherokee
2014Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Lotus EvoraSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
4,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
261 km/hTop speed202 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
342 NmTorque570 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Lotus EvoraSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank93 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lotus EvoraSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
—TransmissionAutomatic
225/40 R18; 255/35 R19Tyre size18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lotus EvoraSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
4350 mmLength4828 mm
1848 mmWidth1943 mm
1229 mmHeight1802 mm
1382 KgWeight2403 kg
—Luggage capacity782 lt
2575 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Lotus Evora and 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…