DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Audi A4 vs 2001 Mitsubishi Airtrek Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Airtrek

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
A4ModelAirtrek
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
125 HPPower126 HP
168 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4479 mmLength4410 mm
1733 mmWidth1750 mm
1417 mmHeight1550 mm
1390 KgWeight1330 Kg
2607 mmWheelbase2626 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Audi A4 and 2001 Mitsubishi Airtrek approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Airtrek leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…