DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lotus Elise vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LotusMakeKia
EliseModelOptima
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,1 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
160 HPPower134 HP
175 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3785 mmLength4745 mm
1719 mmWidth1815 mm
1143 mmHeight1420 mm
805 KgWeight1390 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lotus Elise and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…