DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A4 vs 2000 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A4SpecificationFord Contour
AudiMakeFord
A4ModelContour
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi A4SpecificationFord Contour
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1982 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
168 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A4SpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A4SpecificationFord Contour
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A4SpecificationFord Contour
4479 mmLength4671 mm
1733 mmWidth1755 mm
1417 mmHeight1384 mm
1390 KgWeight1257 Kg
2607 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A4 and 2000 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…