1998 • AC
Aceca
AC Aceca 4.6 i V8 32V (326 Hp) 1998Overall Score81.5/100
1998 AC Aceca vs 1998 Lincoln Continental Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Lincoln
Continental
Lincoln Continental 4.6 V8 32V (279 Hp) 1998Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
AC Aceca
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Continental
ACMakeLincoln
AcecaModelContinental
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Continental
6,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
326 HPPower279 HP
427 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Continental
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank76 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Continental
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/55 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Continental
4660 mmLength5260 mm
1890 mmWidth1870 mm
1340 mmHeight1420 mm
1615 KgWeight1745 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2770 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 AC Aceca and 1998 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…