DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeHolden
MarkModelCalais
1998Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
232 HPPower243 HP
447 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank73 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength4885 mm
1900 mmWidth1840 mm
1360 mmHeight1450 mm
1730 KgWeight1630 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…