DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A4 vs 2005 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
A4ModelMatrix
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
236 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
190 HPPower183 HP
240 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4548 mmLength4350 mm
1772 mmWidth1775 mm
1428 mmHeight1540 mm
1395 KgWeight1270 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A4 and 2005 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…