DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
MarkModelCrown Victoria
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats6
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
280 HPPower238 HP
387 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16 VTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength5385 mm
1900 mmWidth1986 mm
1361 mmHeight1443 mm
1715 KgWeight1855 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2913 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…