1999 • Lincoln
Mark
Lincoln Mark 4.6 i V8 32V (280 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
1999 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (263 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lincoln MarkSpecificationFord Mustang
LincolnMakeFord
MarkModelMustang
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Lincoln MarkSpecificationFord Mustang
—0–100 km/h5,5 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
280 HPPower263 HP
387 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Lincoln MarkSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lincoln MarkSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16 VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lincoln MarkSpecificationFord Mustang
5265 mmLength4653 mm
1900 mmWidth1857 mm
1361 mmHeight1350 mm
1715 KgWeight1550 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…