DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Lincoln LS vs 2009 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
LincolnMakeVolvo
LSModelS80
2006Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4414 cc
284 HPPower315 HP
388 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationVolvo S80
4925 mmLength4851 mm
1860 mmWidth1860 mm
1450 mmHeight1490 mm
1710 KgWeight1742 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Lincoln LS and 2009 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…