DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Lincoln LS vs 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeMitsubishi
LSModelChallenger
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
219 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
213 HPPower185 HP
278 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4530 mm
1869 mmWidth1775 mm
1425 mmHeight1730 mm
1670 KgWeight1830 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Lincoln LS and 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…