DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Cadillac Catera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeCadillac
LSModelCatera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
223 HPPower203 HP
292 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4930 mm
1860 mmWidth1790 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1630 KgWeight1710 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…