DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeMercedes-Benz
LSModelML
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
223 HPPower218 HP
292 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank83 lt
14 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4587 mm
1860 mmWidth1833 mm
1450 mmHeight1820 mm
1630 KgWeight1990 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…